HAARP seeing the light... and more!
Photo from a recent experiment where Haarp produced a visible Aurora accompanied by "Orbs". FRJ
"HAARP", much more than meets the eye going on here, read the original DOD document which in itself
is astounding, please pay close attention to the highlighted text. FRJ
{ Icons provide links to relevant sites }

Creation of visible artificial optical emissions in the aurora
by high-power radio waves

TODD. R. PEDERSEN-[ 1 ]AND ELIZABETH A. GERKEN-[ 2 ]

1] Space Vehicles Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts 01731,
USA
2] Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA


Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to T.R.P. (todd.pedersen@hanscom.af.mil).

Generation of artificial light in the sky by means of high-power radio waves interacting with the ionospheric plasma
has been envisaged since the early days of radio exploration of the upper atmosphere, with proposed applications
ranging from regional night-time street lighting to atmospheric measurements. Weak optical emissions have been
produced for decades in such ionospheric 'heating' experiments, where they serve as key indicators of electron
acceleration, thermal heating, and other effects of incompletely understood wave–particle interactions in the
plasma under conditions difficult to replicate in the laboratory. The extremely low intensities produced previously
have, however, required sensitive instrumentation for detection, preventing applications beyond scientific research.
Here we report observations of radio-induced optical emissions bright enough to be seen by the naked eye, and
produced not in the quiet mid-latitude ionosphere, but in the midst of a pulsating natural aurora. This may open the
door to visual applications of ionospheric heating technology or provide a way to probe the dynamics of the natural
aurora and magnetosphere.

The most readily observed emissions produced in ionospheric heating  
are the 'forbidden' red and green lines from atomic oxygen at 630.0  
and 557.7 nm, both common components of the natural aurora and  
airglow3. In almost all past experiments, artificial emissions have  
been produced by the interaction of radio waves with the ionospheric
F  
region, the long-lived primary ionospheric layer composed of atomic  
ions at an altitude of several hundred kilometres4. Only rarely have  
optical effects been reported from the ionospheric E region5, an  
ephemeral layer created from occasional meteoric ions or continuous  
solar illumination or auroral precipitation near an altitude of 100
km , where increased collisions with neutral molecules alter the  
behaviour of the plasma, and the proximity to the transmitter
provides  
a large inverse-square increase in power density5. Emission  
intensities achieved previously have typically ranged up to several  
hundred Rayleighs (1 R = 106 photons cm-2 s-1 integrated along a line  
of sight) for the more easily excited red line and tens of Rayleighs  
for the higher-energy green line. In all cases, intensities have  
remained far below the threshold for detection by the human eye,
which  
is given as 20 kR at 630 nm (ref. 2) towards the red end of the  
visible wavelength range, and 1 kR for 558 nm (ref. 6) near the peak  
> sensitivity of the eye.
>
We recently produced dramatically stronger artificial optical  
emissions bright enough to be visible to the naked eye in an  
experiment targeting the ionospheric E layer created by the natural  
aurora.
The experiment was conducted on 10 March 2004, between 6–7
UT,  
using the 960-kW transmitter array at the High Frequency Active  
Auroral Research Program (HAARP) facility near Gakona, Alaska (62.4°  
N, 145.15° W). The HAARP transmitter was run in a 15-s cycle  
alternating between 7.5 s of full power and 7.5 s off. Four filtered  
optical imaging systems ranging from all-sky to telescopic were  
operated in synchronization with the transmitter on and off
intervals.  
Background conditions during the experiment period were characterized  
by aurora pulsating with apparent periods of 10 s in longitudinal  
bands running in the magnetic east–west direction over most of the  
sky, including the region within the transmitter beam (Fig. 1). The  
auroral precipitation created a blanketing E layer near an altitude
of  
100 km with critical frequencies ranging from 4–6 MHz.


For a period of approximately 10 min between about 06:40 and 06:50,
a  number of small speckles
{Orbs FRJ } of enhanced green emission
were observed with  the HAARP telescope wide-field camera,
which provided high-resolution  
images of the region within the transmitter beam near magnetic zenith  
The speckles were present only during the image frames when  
the transmitter was on and were absent from exposures taken during
the  off periods. There is evidence of dynamic pulsations in the
background  aurora within this narrower field of view as well, such as the
auroral  bands that appear and disappear in the lower left corner of the  
images. The largest speckles are approximately one degree across.


Within a given frame the speckles
{ Orbs, FRJ } appear to be randomly distributed,  
but upon closer examination of successive 'on' frames, some of the  
speckles often appear to be correlated with but displaced from those  
seen in the previous 'on' period. This suggests that some speckle  
features are in motion but may still retain coherence across multiple  
on–off cycles of the transmitter.

Calibrated average intensities for the background aurora within the  
transmitter beam were obtained from another imager, which made  
measurements at several different wavelengths once each minute. In spite of the
rapid pulsations in narrow bands and on 10-s  
timescales, the average auroral brightness at 557.7 nm remained near
4  kR, with an increase to 5 kR near the time the speckles were
observed.  
This intensity calibration, applied to the high-resolution data in  
Fig. 2, indicates that the brightest speckles were approximately 4 kR  
in total intensity, well above the threshold for visibility and 1 kR  
or more above the darker auroral regions.


Given the unprecedented brightness of the speckles, we carried out a  
number of tests to rule out potential artefacts, including: repeating  
the transmission pattern at a different time to rule out  
radio-frequency (r.f.) interference with the camera electronics,  
verifying from radar records that no aircraft were in the area, and  
measuring the periods of white-light sources such as nearby  
communications towers and airport beacons. We attempted to reproduce  
the results whenever an aurora moved into range, but auroral events  
later in the experiment window never produced E layers of sufficient  
density to support significant transmissions at the original
frequency  again. More detailed analysis of the data revealed additional
weak speckles earlier in the original 6-UT hour, at about 06:20 UT, when  
he transmitter was operated at a lower frequency (and lower
effective power), and some of the brightest speckles were also identified in  
data from one of the other lower-resolution camera systems operated  
from a separate building, eliminating any doubt that the speckles  
represent actual light from the sky.

Although visible levels of artificial optical emissions have not
been  reported previously, there have been other attempts made to
stimulate the auroral E layer with radio waves. A similar experiment
that used low-light television cameras and a 2-s on–off cycle but different  
polarization reported an estimated modulation of less than 10 R,  
interpreted as radio-induced decreases in the green line emission7.  
Large-scale structural changes in the overhead aurora have been  
reported in conjunction with E-layer heating8, but the extremely
small number of cases and the close similarity of the observed effects to  
naturally occurring processes make it difficult to assess the true  
influence of the radio waves on the auroral events. In contrast, the  
recent HAARP observations demonstrate clear on-off control of the  
> speckles over 50 or more complete cycles.

Potential sources of the observed bright speckles fall into two  
categories: production in the local E-region ionosphere by the  
transmitter beam, or indirect creation by modification of the auroral  
particle precipitation, which then produces the optical speckles in  
the same way as the background aurora. If the speckles are locally  
generated, the role of the natural aurora would probably be limited
to  creation of the E layer for the radio waves to interact with, and it  
might be possible to generate similar phenomena in non-auroral E  
layers independent of any specific on-off cycling, a potentially  
desirable condition for creation of visible artificial light. If, on  
the other hand, the speckles result from modification of the auroral  
particle population, perhaps through perturbations to currents
flowing  in the E layer or a wave resonance, we expect that the specific  
frequency of the on–off cycling relative to the natural pulsation  
frequencies might be a critical parameter, and experiments of this  
type could potentially become a new tool for exploration of  
time-dependent processes in the aurora and magnetosphere.

Received 13 September 2004;accepted 6 December 2004

References 1. Bailey, V. A. On some effects caused in the ionosphere  
by electric waves, Part II. Phil. Mag. 26(7), 425–453 (1938)
2. Bernhardt, P., Duncan, L. M. & Tepley, C. A. Artificial airglow  
excited by high-power radio waves. Science 242, 1022–1027 (1988)
3. Chamberlain, J. W. Physics of the Aurora and Airglow  
(International Geophysics Series Vol. 2, Academic, New York, 1961)
4. Rishbeth, H. & Garriot, O. K Introduction to Ionospheric Physics  
(Academic, New York, 1969)
5. Djuth, F. T. et al. Large airglow enhancements produced via  
wave-plasma interactions in sporadic E. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26,  
1557–1560 (1999) | Article |
6. Omholt, A. The Optical Aurora 6 (Physics and Chemistry in Space  
Vol. 4, Springer, New York, 1971)
7. Sergienko, T., Kornilov, I., Belova, E., Turunen, T. & Manninen,  
J. Optical effects in the aurora caused by ionospheric HF heating. J.  
Atmos. Sol-Terr. Phys. 59, 2401–2407 (1997) | Article |
8. Blagoveshchenskaya, N. F. et al. Ionospheric HF pump wave  
triggering of local auroral activation. J. Geophys. Res. 106,   29071–29089
(2001) | Article |
9. Bauer, S. J. Physics of Planetary Ionospheres 82–95 (Physics and  
Chemistry in Space Vol. 6, Springer, New York, 1973)
10. Davis, N. The Aurora Watchers Handbook 58 (Univ. Alaska Press,
Fairbanks, 1992)
11. Carlson, H. C. Jr & Egeland, A. in Introduction to Space Physics  
(eds Kivelson, M. G. & Russell, V.) 459–502
(Cambridge Press, New  York, 1995)

Acknowledgements. HAARP is a Department of Defense programme
operated   jointly by the US Air Force and US Navy. We thank E. Mishin for
his contributions to the experiment planning and P. Ning for operating
the   all-sky imager.

Competing interests statement. The authors declare that they have no  
competing financial interests.

Complete HAARP Overview Below...

Back to Eyepod Front Page

Click on Eyepod.Org button below to search the entire site.
Google
Web Eyepod.Org


HAARP Executive Summary



HAARP

HF ACTIVE AURORAL RESEARCH PROGRAM

JOINT SERVICES PROGRAM PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

AIR FORCE
GEOPHYSICS LABORATORY

NAVY
OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HF ACTIVE AURORAL RESEARCH PROGRAM (HAARP)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. INTRODUCTION

2. POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS
2.1. Geophysical Probing
2.2. Generation of ELF/VLF Waves
2.3. Generation of Ionospheric Holes/Lens
2.4. Electron Acceleration
2.5. Generation of Field Aligned Ionization
2.6. Oblique HF Heating
2.7. Generation of Ionization Layers Below 90 Km


3. IONOSPHERIC ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH HIGH POWER RF HEATING
3.1. Thresholds of Ionospheric Effects
3.2. General Ionospheric Issues
3.3. High Latitude Ionospheric Issues


4. DESIRED HF HEATING FACILITY
4.1 Heater Characteristics
4.1.1 Effective-Radiated-power (ERP]
4.1.2 Frequency Range of Operation
4.1.3 Scanning Capabilities
4.1.4. Modes of Operation
4.1.5 Wave Polarization
4.1.6 Agility in Changing Heater Parameters


4.2. Heater Diagnostics
4.2.1. Incoherent Scatter Radar Facility
4.2.2. Other Diagnostics
4.2.3. Additional Diagnostics for ELF Generation Experiments


4.3. HF Heater Location
4.4. Estimated Cost of the New Heating Facility

5. PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS

6. PLANS FOR RESEARCH ON THE GENERATION OF ELF SIGNALS IN THE IONOSPHERE BY MODULATING THE
POLAR ELECTROJET
6.1. Ionospheric Issues as They Relate to ELF Generation
6.1.1 Ionospheric Research Needs
6.1.2. Ionospheric Research Recommendations
6.2 HF to ELF Excitation Efficiency
6.2.1. Low-Altitude Heating Issues
6.2.2. Low-Altitude Heating Research Recommendations
6.2.3. High-Altitude Heating Issues
6.2.4. High-Altitude Heating Research Recommendations
6.3. Submarine Communication Issues Associated With Exploiting ELF Signals Generated in the Ionosphere by HF
Heating
6.3.1. General Research Issues
6.3.2. Specific ELF Systems Issuesv 6.4. ELF System-Related Research Recommendations

7. SUMMARY OF HAARP INITIATION ACTIVITIES
7.1. HAARP Steering Group
7.2. Summary of HAARP Steering Group Activities and Schedule

APPENDIX A HF Heating Facilities

APPENDIX B Workshop on Ionospheric Modification and generation of ELF
Workshop Agenda
Workshop Attendance Roster

HAARP -- HF Active Auroral Research
Program

Executive Summary

As described in the accompanying report, the HF Active Auroral Ionospheric Research Program (HAARP) is
especially attractive in that it will insure that research in an emerging, revolutionary, technology area will be focused
towards identifying and exploiting techniques to greatly enhance C3 capabilities. The heart of the program will be
the development of a unique high frequency (HF) ionospheric heating capability to conduct the pioneering
experiments required under the program.

Applications

An exciting and challenging aspect of ionospheric enhancement is its potential to control ionospheric processes in
such a way as to greatly improve the performance of C3 systems. A key goal of the program is the identification
and investigation of those ionospheric processes and phenomena that can be exploited for DOD purposes, such as
those outlined below.

Generation of ELF waves in the 70-150 Hz band to provide communications to deeply submerged submarines. A
program to develop efficient ELF generation techniques is planned under the DOD ionospheric enhancement
program.

Geophysical probing to identify and characterize natural ionospheric processes that limit the performance of C3
systems, so that techniques can be developed to mitigate or control them. Generation of ionospheric lenses to
focus large amounts of HF energy at high altitudes in the ionosphere, thus providing a means for triggering
ionospheric processes that potentially could be exploited for DOD purposes.

Electron acceleration for the generation of IR and other optical emissions, and to create additional ionization in
selected regions of the ionosphere that could be used to control radio wave - propagation properties.

Generation of geomagnetic-field aligned ionization to control the reflection/scattering properties of radio waves.

Oblique heating to produce effects on radio wave propagation at great distances from a HF heater, thus
broadening the potential military applications of ionospheric enhancement technology.

Generation of ionization layers below 90 km to provide, radio wave reflectors (mirrors) which can be exploited for
long range, over-the-horizon, HF/VHF/UHF surveillance purposes, including the detection of cruise missiles and
other low observables.

Desired HF Heater Characteristics

A new, unique, HF heating facility is required to address the broad range of issues identified above. However, in
order to have a useful facility at various stages of its development, it is important that the heater be constructed in
a modular manner, such that its effective-radiated-power can be increased in an efficient, cost effective manner as
resources become available.

Effective-Radiated-Powers (ERP) in Excess of 1 Gigawatt

One gigawatt of effective-radiated-power represents an important threshold power level, over which significant
wave generation and electron acceleration efficiencies can be achieved, and other significant heating effects can
be expected.

Broad HF Frequency Range

The desired heater would have a frequency range from around 1 MHz to about 15 MHz, thereby allowing a wide
range of ionospheric processes to be investigated.

Scanning Capabilities

A heater that has rapid scanning capabilities is very desirable to enlarge the size of heated regions in the
ionosphere Continuous Wave (CW) and Pulse Modes of Operation. Flexibility in choosing heating modes of
operation will allow a wider variety of ionospheric enhancement techniques and issues to be addressed.

Polarization

The facility should permit both X and O polarization in order to study ionospheric processes over a range of
altitudes.

Agility in Changing Heater Parameters

The ability to quickly change the heater parameters is important for addressing such issues as enlarging the size of
the heated region the ionosphere and the development of techniques to insure that the energy densities desired in
the ionosphere can be delivered without self-limiting effects setting-in.

HF Heating Diagnostics

In order to understand natural ionospheric processes as well as those induced through active modification of the
ionosphere, adequate instrumentation is required to measure a wide range of ionospheric .parameters on the
appropriate- temporal and spatial scales. A key diagnostic these measurements will be an incoherent scatter radar
facility to provide the means to monitor such background plasma conditions as electron densities, electron and ion
temperatures, and electric fields, all as a function of altitude. The incoherent scatter radar facility, envisioned to
complement the planned new HF heater, is currently being funded in a separate DOD program, as part of an
upgrade at the Poker Flat rocket range, in Alaska.

For ELF generation experiments, the diagnostics complement would include a chain of ELF receivers, a digital HF
ionosonde, a magnetometer chain, photometers, a VLF sounder, and a VHF riometer. In other experiments, in situ
measurements of the heated region in the ionosphere, via rocket-borne instrumentation, would also be very
desirable. Other diagnostics to be employed, depending on the nature of the ionospheric modifications being
implemented, will include HF receivers, HF/VHF radars, optical imagers, and scintillation observations.

HF Heater Location

One of the major issues to be addressed under the program is the generation of ELF waves in the ionosphere by
HF heating. This requires location the heater where there are strong ionospheric currents, either at an equatorial
location or a high latitude (auroral) location. Additional factors to be considered in locating the heater include other
technical (research) needs and requirements, environmental issues, future expansion capabilities (real estate),
infrastructure, and considerations of the availability and location of diagnostics. The location of the new HF heating
facility is planned for Alaska, relatively near to a new incoherent scatter facility, already planned for the Poker Flat
rocket range under a separate DOD program.

In addition, it is desirable that the HF heater be located to permit rocket probe instrumentation to be flown into the
heated region of the ionosphere. The exact location in Alaska for the proposed new HF heating facility has not yet
been determined.

Estimated Cost of the New HF Heating Facility

It is estimated that eight to ten million dollars ($8-10M) will provide a new facility with an effective-radiated-power of
approximately that of the current DOD facility (HIPAS), but with considerable improvement in frequency tunability
and antenna-beam steering capability. The facility will be of modular design to permit efficient and cost-effective
upgrades in power as additional funds become available. The desired (world-class) facility, having the broad
capabilities and flexibility described above, will cost on the order of twenty-five to thirty million dollars ($25-30M).

Program Participants

The program will be jointly managed by the Navy and the Air Force. However, because of the wide variety of issues
to be addressed, active participation of the government agencies, universities, and private contractors is
envisioned.

HF Active Auroral Research Program

The DOD HF Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) is especially attractive in that it will insure that research in
an emerging, revolutionary, technology area will be focused towards identifying and exploiting techniques to greatly
enhance C3 capabilities. The heart of the program will be the development of a unique ionospheric heating
capability to conduct the pioneering experiments required to adequately assess the potential for exploiting
ionospheric enhancement technology for DOD (Dept. of Defense) purposes. As outlined below, such a research
facility will provide the means for investigating the creation, maintenance, and control of a large number and wide
variety of ionospheric processes that, if exploited, could provide significant operational capabilities and advantages
over conventional C3 systems. The research to be conducted in the program will include basic, exploratory, and
applied efforts.

1. Introduction

DoD agencies already have on-going efforts in the broad area of active ionospheric experiments, including
ionospheric enhancements. These include both space- and ground-based approaches. The space-based efforts
include chemical releases (e.g., the Air Force's Brazilian Ionospheric Modification Experiment, BIME; the Navy's
RED AIR program; and multi-agency participation in the Combined Release and Radiation Effects Satellite,
CRRES). In addition other, planned, programs will employ particle beams and accelerators aboard rockets (e.g.,
EXCEDE and CHARGE IV), and shuttle- or satellite-borne RF transmitters (e.g., WISP and ACTIVE). Ground-based
techniques employ the use of high power, radio frequency (RF), transmitters (so-called "heaters") to provide the
energy in the ionosphere that causes it to be altered, or enhanced. The use of such heaters has a number of
advantages over space-based approaches.

These include the possibility of repeating experiments under controlled conditions, and the capability of conducting
a wide variety of experiments using the same facility. For example, depending on the RF frequency and effective
radiated power (ERP) used, different regions of the atmosphere and the ionosphere can be affected to produce a
number of practical effects, as illustrated in Table 1. Because of the large number and wide variety of those.
effects, and because many of them have the potential to be exploited for important C3 applications, the program is
focused on developing a robust program in the area of ground-based, high power RF heating of the ionosphere.

To date, most DoD ionospheric heating experiments have been conducted to gain better understanding of
ionospheric processes, i.e., they have been used as geophysical-probes. In this, one perturbs the ionosphere, then
studies how it responds to the disturbance and how it ultimately recovers back to ambient conditions. The use of
ionospheric enhancement to simulate ionospheric processes and phenomena is a more recent development, made
possible by the increasing knowledge being obtained on how they evolve naturally. By simulating natural
ionospheric effects it is possible to assess how they may affect the performance of DoD systems. From a DoD point
of view, however, the most exciting and challenging aspect of ionospheric enhancement is its potential to control
ionospheric processes in such a way as to greatly enhance the performance of C3 systems (or to deny accessibility
to an adversary), This is a revolutionary concept in that, rather than accepting the limitations imposed on
operational systems by the natural ionosphere, it envisions seizing control of the propagation medium and shaping
it to insure that a desired system capability can be achieved. A key ingredient of the DOD program is the goal of
identifying and investigating those ionospheric processes and phenomena that can be exploited for such purposes.

2. Potential Applications

A brief description of a variety of potential applications of ionospheric- enhancement technology that could be
addressed in the DOD program are outlined below.

2.1. Geophysical Probing

The use of ionospheric heating to investigate natural ionospheric processes is a traditional one. Such-research is
still required in order to develop models of the ionosphere that can be used to reliably predict the performance of
C3 systems, under both normal and disturbed ionospheric conditions. This aspect of ionospheric enhancement
research is always available to the investigator; in effect, as a by-product of any ionospheric enhancement
research, even if it is driven by specific system applications goals, such as discussed below.

2.2. Generation of ELF/VLF Waves

A number of critical DOD communications systems rely on the use of ELF/VLF (30 Hz-30kHz) radio waves. These
include those associated with the Minimum Essential Emergency Communications Network (MEECN) and those
used to disseminate messages to submerged submarines. In the latter, frequencies in the 70-150 Hz range are
especially attractive, but difficult to generate efficiently with ground-based antenna systems. The potential exists for
generating such waves by ground-based heating of the ionosphere. The heater is used to modulate the
conductivity of the lower ionosphere, which in turn modulates ionospheric currents. This modulated current, in
effect, produces a virtual antenna in the ionosphere for the radiation of radio waves. The technique has already
been used to generate ELF/VLF signals at a number of vertical HF heating facilities in the West and the Soviet
Union. To date, however, these efforts have been confined to essentially basic research studies, and few attempts
have been made to investigate ways to increase the efficiency of such ELF/VLF generation to make it attractive for
communications applications. In this regard, heater generated ELF would be attractive if it could provide
significantly stronger signals than those available from the Navy's existing antenna systems in Wisconsin and
Michigan. Recent theoretical research suggests that this may be possible, provided the appropriate HF heating
facility was available. Because this area of research appears especially promising, and because of existing DOD
requirements for ELF and VLF, it is already a primary driver of the proposed research program.

In addition to its potential application to long range, survivable, DOD communications, there is another potentially
attractive application of strong ELF/VLF waves generated in the ionosphere by ground-based heaters. It is known
that ELF/VLF signals generated by lightning strokes propagate through the ionosphere and interact with charged
Particles trapped along geomagnetic field lines, causing them, from time to time, to precipitate into the lower
ionosphere. If such processes could be reliably controlled, it would be possible to develop techniques to deplete
selected regions of the radiation belts of particles, for short periods, thus allowing satellites to operate within them
without harm to their electronic components, any of the critical issues associated with this concept of radiation-belt
control could be investigated as part of the DOD program.

2.3. Generation of Ionospheric Holes/Lens

It is well known that HF heating produces local depletions ("holes") of electrons, thus altering the refractive
properties of the ionosphere. This in turn affects the propagation of radio waves passing through that region. If
techniques could be developed to exploit this phenomena in such a way as to create an artificial lens, it should be
possible to use the lens as a focus to deliver much larger amounts of HF energy to higher altitudes in the
ionosphere than is presently possible, thus opening up the way for triggering new ionospheric processes and
phenomena that potentially could be exploited for DOD purposes. In fact, the general issue of developing
techniques to insure that large energy densities can be made available at selected regions in the ionosphere, from
ground-based heaters, is an important one that must be addressed in the DOD program.

2.4. Electron Acceleration

If sufficient energy densities are available in the ionosphere it should be possible to accelerate electrons to high
energies, ranging from a few eV to even KeV and MeV levels. Such a capability would provide the means for a
number of interesting DOD applications.

Electrons in the ionosphere accelerated to a few eV would generate a variety of IR and optical emissions.
Observation and quantification of them would provide data on the concentration of minor constituents in the lower
ionosphere and upper atmosphere, which cannot be obtained using conventional probing techniques. Such data
would be important for the development of reliable models of the lower ionosphere which are ultimately used in
developing radio-wave propagation prediction techniques. In addition, heater generated IR/optical emission, over
selected areas of the earth could potentially be used to blind space-based military sensors.

Electrons accelerated to energy levels in the 14-20 eV range would produce new ionization in the ionosphere, via
collisions with neutral particles. This suggests that it may be possible to "condition" the ionosphere so that it would
support HF propagation during periods when the natural ionosphere was especially weak. This could potentially be
exploited for long range (OTH) HF communication/surveillance purposes. Finally, the use of an HF heater to
accelerate electrons to KeV or MeV energy levels could be used, in conjunction with satellite sensor
measurements, for controlled investigations of the effects of high energy electrons on space platforms. There
already is indication that high power transmitters on space-craft accelerate electrons in space to such high energy
levels, and that those charged particles can impact on the spade- craft with harmful effects. The processes which
trigger such phenomena and the development of techniques to avoid or mitigate them could be investigated as part
of the DOD program.

2.5. Generation of Field Aligned Ionization

HF heating of the ionosphere produces patches of ionization that are aligned with the geomagnetic field, thus
producing scattering centers for RF waves. Natural processes also produce such scatterers, as evidenced by the
scintillations observed on satellite-to-ground links in the equatorial and high latitude regions. The use of a HF
heater to generate such scatterers would provide a controlled way to investigate the natural physical processes
that produce them, and could lead conceivably to the development of techniques to predict their natural
occurrence, their structure and persistence, and (ultimately) the degree to which they would affect DOD systems.

One interesting potential application of heater induced field-aligned ionization is already a part of an on-going DOD
(Air Force/RADC) research program, Ducted HF Propagation. It is known that there are high altitude ducts in the E-
and F-regions of the ionosphere (110-250 km altitude range) that can support round-the-world HF Propagation.
Normally, however, geometrical considerations show that it is not possible to gain access to these ducts from
ground-based HF transmitters, From time-to time, however, natural gradients in the ionosphere (often associated
with the day-night terminator) provide a means for scattering such HF signals into the elevated ducts. If access to
such ducts could be done reliably, interesting very long range HF communications and surveillance applications
can be envisioned.

For example, survivable HF propagation above nuclear disturbed ionospheric regions would be possible; or, the
very long range detection of missiles breaking through the ionosphere on their way to targets, could be achieved.
The use of an HF heater to produce field-aligned ionization in a controlled (reliable) way has been suggested as a
means for developing such concepts, and will be tested in an up-coming satellite experiment to be conducted
during FY92. The experiment calls for a heater in Alaska to generate field-aligned ionization that will scatter HF
signals from a nearby transmitter into elevated ducts. A satellite receiver will record the signals to provide data on
the efficiency of the field-aligned ionization as an RF scatterer, as well as the location, persistence, and HF
propagation properties associated with the elevated ducts.

2.6. Oblique HF Heating

Most RF heating experiments being conducted in the West and in the Soviet Union employ vertically propagating
HF waves. As such the region of the ionosphere that is affected is directly above the heater. For broader military
applications, the potential for significantly altering regions of the ionosphere at relatively great distances (1000 km
or more) from a heater is very desirable. This involves the concept of oblique heating. The subject takes an added
importance in that higher and higher effective radiated powers are being projected for future HF communication
and surveillance systems. The potential for those systems to inadvertently modify the ionosphere, thereby
producing self-limiting effects, is a real one that should be investigated, In addition, the vulnerability of HF systems
to unwanted effects produced by other, high power transmitters (friend or foe) should be addressed.

2.7. Generation of Ionization Layers Below 90 Km

The use of very high power RF heaters to accelerate electrons to 14-20 eV opens the way for the creation of
substantial layers of ionization at altitudes where normally there are very few electrons. This concept already has
been the subject of investigations by the Air Force (Geophysics Lab), the Navy (MU), and DARPA. The Air Force, in
particular, has carried the concept, termed Artificial Ionospheric Mirror (AIM), to the point of demonstrating its
technical viability and proposing a new initiative to conduct proof-of-concepts experiments. The RF heater(s) being
considered for AIM are in the 400 MHz-3 GHz range, much higher than the HF frequencies (1.5 MHz-15 MHz)
suitable for investigating the other topics discussed in this summary. As such, the DOD program (HAARP) will not
be directly involved with AIM-related ionospheric enhancement efforts,

3. IONOSPHERIC ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH HIGH POWER RF HEATING

As illustrated in Figure 1, as the HF power delivered to the ionosphere is continuously increased the dissipative
process dominating the response of the geophysical environment changes discontinuously, producing a variety of
ionospheric effects that require investigation. Those anticipated at very high power levels (but not yet available in
the West from existing HF heaters) are especially interesting from the point of view of potential applications for DOD
purposes,

3.1. Thresholds of Ionospheric Effects

At very modest HF powers, two RF waves propagating through a common volume of ionosphere will experience
cross-modulation, a superposition of the amplitude modulation of one RF wave upon another. At HF effective
radiated powers available to the West, measurable bulk electron and ion gas heating is achieved, electromagnetic
radiation (at frequencies other than transmitted) is stimulated, and various parametric instabilities are excited in the
plasma. These include those which structure the plasma so that it scatters RF energy of a wide range of
wavelengths.

Figure 1. Thresholds of Ionospheric Effects as a function of Heater ERP (unavailable)

There is also evidence in the West that at peak power operation parametric instabilities begin to saturate, and at
the same time modest amounts of energy begin to go into electron acceleration, resulting in modest levels of
electron-impact excited airglow. This suggests that at the highest HF powers available in the West, the instabilities
commonly studied are approaching their maximum RF energy dissipative capability, beyond which the plasma
processes will "runaway" until the next limiting process is reached. The airglow enhancements strongly suggest that
this next process then involves wave-particle interactions and electron acceleration.

The Soviets, operating at higher powers than the West, now have claimed significant stimulated ionization by
electron-impact ionization. The claim is that HF energy, via wave-particle interaction, accelerates ionospheric
electrons to energies well in excess of 20 electron volts (eV) so that they will ionize neutral atmospheric particles
with which they collide. Given that the Soviet HF facilities are several times more powerful than the Western facilities
at comparable mid-latitudes, and given that the latter appear to be on a threshold of a new "wave-particle" regime
of phenomena, it is believed that the Soviets have crossed that threshold and are exploring a regime of
phenomena still unavailable for study or application in the West.

The Max Planck HF facility at Tromso, Norway, possesses power comparable to that of the Soviet high power
heaters, yet has never produced airglow enhancements commonly produced by US HF facilities at lower HF power,
but at lower latitudes. This is attributed to a present inadequate understanding 'f how to make the auroral latitude
ionosphere sustain the conditions required to allow the particle acceleration process to dominate, conditions which
are achieved in the (more stable) mid- latitude regions.

What is clear, is that at the gigawatt and above effective radiated power energy density deposited in limited regions
of the ionosphere can drastically alter its thermal, refractive, scattering, and emission character over a very wide
electromagnetic (radio frequency) and optical spectrum, what is needed is the knowledge of how to select desired
effects and suppress undesired ones. At present levels of understanding, this can only be done by: identifying and
understanding what basic processes are involved, and how they interplay, This can only be done if driven by a
strong experimental program steered by tight coupling to the interactive cycle of developing
theory-model-experimental test.

3.2. General Ionospheric Issues

When a high-power HF radio wave reflects in the ionosphere, a variety of instability processes are triggered. At
early times (less than 200 ms) following HF turn-on, microinstabilities driven by ponderomotive forces are excited
over a large (1-10 km) altitude interval extending downwards from the point of HF reflection to the region of the
upper hybrid resonance. However, at very early times (less than 50 ms) and at late times (greater than l0 s) the
strongest HF-induced Langmuir turbulence appears to occur in the vicinity of HF reflection. The Langmuir
turbulence also gives rise to a population of accelerate electrons. Over time scales op 100's of milliseconds and
longer, the microinstabilities must coexist with other instabilities that are either triggered or directly driven by the
HF-induced turbulence. Some of these instabilities are believed to be explosive in character. The dissipation of the
Langmuir turbulence is thought to give rise to meter-scale irregularities through several different instability routes.
Finally, over time scales of tens of seconds and longer, several thermally driven instabilities can be excited which
give rise to kilometer-scale ionospheric irregularities. Some of these irregularities are aligned with the geomagnetic
field, while others are aligned either along the axis of the HF beam or parallel to the horizontal.

Recently, ionospheric diagnostics of HF modification have evolved to the point where individual instability
processes can be examined in detail. Because of improved diagnostic capabilities, it is now clear that the
wave-plasma interactions once thought to be rather simple are in fact rather complex. For example, the latest
experimental findings at Arecibo Observatory suggest that plasma processes responsible for the excitation of
Langmuir turbulence in the ionosphere are fundamentally different from past treatments based on so-called "weak
turbulence theory".

This theoretical approach relies on random phase approximations to treat the amplification of linear plasma waves
by parametric instabilities. Research in HF ionospheric modification during the period 1970-1986 commonly
focused on parametric instabilities to explain observational results. In contrast, there is in increasing evidence that
the conventional picture is wrong and that the ionospheric plasma undergoes a highly nonlinear development,
culminating in the formation of localized states of strong plasma turbulence. The highly localized state (often
referred to as cavitons) consists of high-frequency plasma waves trapped in self- consistent electron density
depletions.

It is important to realize that many different instabilities are simultaneously excited in the plasma and that one
instability process can greatly influence the development of another. Studies of competition between similar types
of instability processes and the interaction between dissimilar wave-plasma interactions are in the earliest stages of
development. However, it is clear that the degree to which one instability is excited in the plasma may severely
impact a variety of other HF-induced processes through HF-induced pump wave absorption, changes in particle
distribution functions, and the disruption op other coherently-driven processes relying on smooth ionospheric
electron density gradients. Because the efficiency of many instability processes is dependent on geomagnetic dip
angle, the nature of instability competition in the plasma is expected to change with geomagnetic latitude. Indeed,
observational results strongly support this notion. consequently, it may be very difficult to extrapolate the
observational results obtained at one geomagnetic latitude to another. Moreover, even at one experimental station,
physical phenomena excited by a high-power HF wave is strongly dependent upon background ionospheric
conditions. A classic illustration of this point may be found in Arecibo observations made when local electron energy
dissipation rates are low. In this case, the ionospheric plasma literally overheats due to the absence of effective
electron thermal loss processes.

The large (factor of four) enhancement in electron temperature that accompanies this phenomenon gives rise to a
class of instability processes that is completely different from others observed under "normal" conditions where the
ionospheric thermal balance is not greatly disrupted. At ERPs greater than a gigawatt (greater than 90 dBW),
ponderomotive forces are no longer small compared to thermal forces. This may qualitatively change the nature of
the instability processes in the ionosphere. Experimental research in this area, however, must wait until such
powerful ionospheric heaters are developed.

3.3. High Latitude Ionospheric Issues

Radio wave heating of the ionosphere at mid-latitudes (e.g., Arecibo and Platteville) has occurred under conditions
where the background ionosphere (prior to turning on the heater) was fairly laminar, stable, fixed, etc. However, at
high latitudes (i.e., auroral latitudes such as HIPAS and Tromso) the background ionosphere is a dynamic entity.
Even the location of the aurora and the electrojet are changing as a function of latitude, altitude and local time.
Moreover, the background E- and F-region ionosphere may not be laminar on scale sizes less than 20 km and less
than 100 km, respectively. Rather, there is the possibility of E- and F- region irregularities (with scale sizes from
cms to kms) occurring at various times due to (for example) electrojet driven instabilities in the E-region, and
spread F or current driven instabilities in the F-region. High energy particles, e.g., from solar flares, may also lead
to D-region structuring. In addition, connection to the magnetosphere via the high conductivity along magnetic field
lines can play an important role. The theoretical understanding of high latitude ionospheric heating processes has
been improving; however, given the dynamic nature of the high latitude ionosphere, it is important to diagnose the
background ionosphere prior to the inception of any heating experiments. This diagnostic capability aids in
determining long term statistics, as well as real-time parameters. While such diagnostics have been an integral part
of the heating experiments at Arecibo and Tromso, HF heating experiments at HIPAS have been severely
hampered by a lack of similar diagnostics.

4. DESIRED HF HEATING FACILITY

In order to address the broad range of issues discussed in the previous sections, a new, unique, HF heating facility
is required. An outline of the desired capabilities of such a heater, along with diagnostic needed for addressing
these issues are given in Table 2.

(Table 2 not available in this document)

4.1. Heater Characteristics

The goals for the HF heater are very ambitious. In order to have a useful facility at various stages of its
development, it is important that the heater be constructed in a modular manner, such that its effective-
radiated-power can be increased in an efficient, cost effective manner as resources become available. Other
desired HF heater characteristics are outlined below.

Effective-Radiated-Power (ERP)

One gigawatt of effective-radiated-power (90 dBW) represents an important threshold power level, over which
significant wave generation and electron acceleration efficiencies can he achieved, and other significant heating
effects can be expected. To date, the Soviet Union has built such a powerful HF heater. The highest ERPs
achieved by US. facilities is about one-fourth of that. Presently, a heater in Norway, operated by the Max Planck
Institute in the Federal Republic of Germany, is being reconfigured to provide 1 gigawatt of ERP at a single HF
frequency. The HAARP is to ultimately have a HF heater with an ERP well above 1 gigawatt (on the order of 95-100
dBW); in short, the most powerful facility in the world for conducting ionospheric modification research. In achieving
this, the heated area in the F-region should have a minimum diameter of at least 50 km, for
diagnostic-measurement purposes.

4.1.2. Frequency Range of Operation

The desired heater would have a frequency range from around 1 MHz to about 15 MHz, thereby allowing a wide
range of ionospheric processes to be investigated. This incorporates the electron-gyro frequency and would permit
operations under all anticipated ionospheric conditions. Multi-frequency operation using different portions of the
antenna array is also a desirable feature. Finally, frequency changing on an order of milliseconds is desirable over
the bandwidth of the HF transmitting antenna.

4.3. Scanning Capabilities

A heater that has scanning capabilities is very desirable in order to enlarge the size of heated regions in the
ionosphere. Although a scanning range from vertical to very oblique (about 10 degrees above the horizon) would
be desirable, engineering considerations will most likely narrow the scanning range to about 45 degrees from the
vertical. The capability of rapidly scanning (microseconds time scale) in any direction, is also very desirable.

4.1.4. Modes of Operation

Flexibility in choosing heating modes of operation, including continuous- wave (CW) and pulsed modes, will allow a
wider variety of ionospheric modification techniques and issues to be addressed.

4.1.5. Wave polarization

The heater should permit both X and O polarizations to be transmitted, in order to study ionospheric processes
over a range of altitudes.

4.1.6. Agility in Changing Heater Parameters

The ability to quickly change heater parameters, such as operating frequency, scan angle and direction, power
levels, and modulation is important for addressing such issues as enlarging the size of the modified region in the
ionosphere and the development of techniques to insure that the energy densities desired in the ionosphere can
be delivered from the heater without self-limiting effects setting-in.

4.2. Heating Diagnostics

In order to understand natural ionospheric processes as well as those induced through active modification of the
ionosphere, adequate instrumentation is required to measure a wide range of ionospheric parameters on the
appropriate temporal and spatial scales.

4.2.1. Incoherent Scatter Radar Facility

A key diagnostic for these measurements will be an incoherent scatter radar facility to provide the means to monitor
such background plasma conditions as electron densities, electron and ion temperatures, and electric fields, all as
a function of altitude. In addition, the incoherent scatter radar will provide the means for closely examining the
generation of plasma turbulence and the acceleration of electrons to high energies in the ionosphere by HF
heating. The incoherent scatter radar facility, envisioned to complement the planned new HF heater, is currently
being funded in a separate DOD program, as part of an upgrade at the Poker Flat rocket range, in Alaska.

4.2.2. Other Diagnostics

The capability of conducting in situ measurements of the heated region in the ionosphere, via rocket-borne
instrumentation, is also very desirable. Other diagnostics to be employed, depending on the specific nature of the
HF heating experiments, may include HF receivers for the detection of stimulated electromagnetic emissions from
heater induced turbulence in the ionosphere; HF/VHF radars, to determine the amplitudes of short-scale (1-10 m)
geomagnetic field-aligned irregularities; optical imagers, to determine the flux and energy spectrum of accelerated
electrons and to provide a three-dimensional view of artificially produced airglow in the upper atmosphere: and,
scintillation observations, to be used in assessing the impact of HF heating on satellite downlinks and in diagnosing
large- scale ionospheric structures.

4.2.3. Additional Diagnostics for ELF Generation Experiments

These could include a chain of ELF receivers to record signal strengths at various distances from the heater; a
digital HF ionosonde, to determine background electron density profiles in the E- and F-regions; a magnetometer
chain, to observe changes in the earth's magnetic field in order to determine large volume ionospheric currents and
electric fields; photometers, to aid in determining ionospheric conductivities and observing precipitating particles; a
VLF sounder, to determine changes in the D-region of the ionosphere; and, a riometer, to provide additional data
in these regards, especially for disturbed ionospheric conditions.

4.3. HF Heater Location

One of the major issues to be addressed under the program is the generation of ELF waves in the ionosphere by
HF heating. This requires locating the heater where there are strong atmospheric currents, either at an equatorial
location or at a high latitude (auroral) location. Additional factors to be considered in locating the heater include
other technical (research) needs and requirements, environmental issues, future expansion capabilities (real
estate), infrastructure, and considerations of the availability and location of diagnostics. The location of the new HF
heating facility is planned for Alaska, relatively near to a new incoherent scatter facility, already planned for the
Poker Flat rocket range under a separate DOD program. In addition, it is desirable that the HF heater be located to
permit rocket probe instrumentation to be flown into the heated region of the ionosphere. The exact location in
Alaska for the proposed new HF heating facility has not yet been determined.

4.4. Estimated Cost of the New HF Heating Facility

It is estimated that eight to ten million dollars ($8-10M) will provide a new HF heating facility with an
effective-radiated-power of approximately that of the current DOD facility (HIPAS), but with considerable
improvement in frequency tunability and antenna-beam steering capability, The new facility will be of modular
design to permit efficient and cost-effective upgrades in power as additional funds become available. The desired
(world-class) facility, having the broad capabilities and flexibility described above, will cost on the order of
twenty-five to thirty million dollars ($25-30M).

5. PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS

The program will be jointly managed by the Navy and the Air Force. However, because of the wide variety of issues
to be addressed, substantial involvement in the program by other government agencies (DARPA, DNA, NSF, etc.),
universities, and private contractors is envisioned.




Back to Eyepod Front Page
Google
Web Eyepod.Org


The USAF {click on icon} cover
story of weather control by
2025. Truth be known the
Antarctic situation has been a
thorn in the side of the
U.S.Government since the
beginning of the modern day
UFO situation . The existence of
secret bases in the region has
been known since the end of
the second World War. The
sometimes invisible realm
{including UFOs} can now be
seen and if "necessary"
destroyed with this and other
"Tesla like" tactical umbrella
technology. Deterring the target
is the main goal.  FRJ
From the Enterprise Mission...
According to reports in the Anchorage
Daily News, an "eerie blue-green"
fireball was spotted moving roughly
east to west over South Central Alaska
on the evening of the 8th. At about
10:20 PM, numerous witnesses
reported a brilliant flash of light and a
deafening explosion. The fireball and
explosion were witnessed by two
National Park rangers and their wives
as they traveled along the Parks
Highway. One of them described the
core as bright orange, with a brilliant
white tail and and a second "hot gas
green" tail behind the first one.
Residents in Palmer, Alaska stated
that the rumbling shock wave could be
heard coming from the direction of
Sutton, Alaska, about 10 miles to the
northeast. The blast was also heard in
Wasilla, Alaska and the fireball was
spotted from Anchorage. There was
an apparently unconnected
earthquake in the area about one
hour later. The reports were alarming
enough that state troopers took a
helicopter up to Mount Mckinley the
following day to look for an impact site.
Map of the implosion point for the
Alaskan "fireball" as investigated by
the Enterprise Mission. In reality this
was an example of high range beam
technology and HAARP. What was
destroyed was an incoming hostile
target based out of Antarctica. The
joint
Russian & US missile exercises
are a warning to stay away.  FRJ
No "fireball" an "IFO" disintegrates. FRJ
click on map for larger image
Click on photos for larger image... FRJ
Enterprise Mission's report of a target
destroyed over HAARP's installation.
See below for our statement of facts.
The Military's Pandora's Box

by Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Manning


This article was prepared to provide a summary of the contents of a book written in 1995 which describes an
entirely new class of weapons. The weapons and their effects are described in the following pages. The United
States Navy and Air Force have joined with the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, to build a prototype for a ground
based "Star Wars" weapon system located in the remote bush country of Alaska.

The individuals who are demanding answers about HAARP are scattered around the planet. As well as bush
dwellers in Alaska, they include: a physician in Finland; a scientist in Holland; an anti-nuclear protester in Australia;
independent physicists in the United States; a grandmother in Canada, and countless others.

Unlike the protests of the 1960s the objections to HAARP have been registered using the tools of the 1990s. From
the Internet, fax machines, syndicated talk radio and a number of alternative print mediums the word is getting out
and people are waking up to this new intrusion by an over zealous United States government.

The research team put together to gather the materials which eventually found their way into the book never held a
formal meeting, never formed a formal organization. Each person acted like a node on a planetary info-spirit-net
with one goal held by all -- to keep this controversial new science in the public eye. The result of the team's effort
was a book which describes the science and the political ramifications of this technology.

That book, Angels Don't Play this HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology, has 230 pages. This article will only give
the highlights. Despite the amount of research (350 footnoted sources), at its heart it is a story about ordinary
people who took on an extraordinary challenge in bringing their research forward.



HAARP Boils the Upper Atmosphere

HAARP will zap the upper atmosphere with a focused and steerable electromagnetic beam. It is an advanced model
of an "ionospheric heater." (The ionosphere is the electrically-charged sphere surrounding Earth's upper
atmosphere. It ranges between 40 to 60 miles above the surface of the Earth.)
Put simply, the apparatus for HAARP is a reversal of a radio telescope; antenna send out signals instead of
receiving. HAARP is the test run for a super-powerful radiowave-beaming technology that lifts areas of the
ionosphere by focusing a beam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto earth and
penetrate everything -- living and dead.

HAARP publicity gives the impression that the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program is mainly an
academic project with the goal of changing the ionosphere to improve communications for our own good. However,
other U.S. military documents put it more clearly -- HAARP aims to learn how to "exploit the ionosphere for
Department of Defense purposes." Communicating with submarines is only one of those purposes.

Press releases and other information from the military on HAARP continually downplay what it could do. Publicity
documents insist that the HAARP project is no different than other ionospheric heaters operating safely throughout
the world in places such as Arecibo, Puerto Rico, Tromso, Norway, and the former Soviet Union. However, a 1990
government document indicates that the radio-frequency (RF) power zap will drive the ionosphere to unnatural
activities.
" ... at the highest HF powers available in the West, the instabilities commonly studied are approaching their
maximum RF energy dissipative capability, beyond which the plasma processes will 'runaway' until the next limiting
factor is reached."
If the military, in cooperation with the University of Alaska Fairbanks, can show that this new ground-based "Star
Wars" technology is sound, they both win. The military has a relatively-inexpensive defense shield and the
University can brag about the most dramatic geophysical manipulation since atmospheric explosions of nuclear
bombs. After successful testing, they would have the military megaprojects of the future and huge markets for
Alaska's North Slope natural gas.

Looking at the other patents which built on the work of a Texas' physicist named Bernard Eastlund, it becomes
clearer how the military intends to use the HAARP transmitter. It also makes governmental denials less believable.
The military knows how it intends to use this technology, and has made it clear in their documents. The military has
deliberately misled the public, through sophisticated word games, deceit and outright disinformation.

The military says the HAARP system could:
Give the military a tool to replace the electromagnetic pulse effect of atmospheric thermonuclear devices (still
considered a viable option by the military through at least 1986)
Replace the huge Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) submarine communication system operating in Michigan and
Wisconsin with a new and more compact technology
Be used to replace the over-the-horizon radar system that was once planned for the current location of HAARP, with
a more flexible and accurate system
Provide a way to wipe out communications over an extremely large area, while keeping the military's own
communications systems working
Provide a wide area earth-penetrating tomography which, if combined with the computing abilities of EMASS and
Cray computers, would make it possible to verify many parts of nuclear nonproliferation and peace agreements
Be a tool for geophysical probing to find oil, gas and mineral deposits over a large area
Be used to detect incoming low-level planes and cruise missiles, making other technologies obsolete
The above abilities seem like a good idea to all who believe in sound national defense, and to those concerned
about cost-cutting. However, the possible uses which the HAARP records do not explain, and which can only be
found in Air Force, Army, Navy and other federal agency records, are alarming. Moreover, effects from the reckless
use of these power levels in our natural shield -- the ionosphere -- could be cataclysmic according to some
scientists.

Two Alaskans put it bluntly. A founder of the NO HAARP movement, Clare Zickuhr, says "The military is going to
give the ionosphere a big kick and see what happens."

The military failed to tell the public that they do not know what exactly will happen, but a Penn State science article
brags about that uncertainty. Macho science? The HAARP project uses the largest energy levels yet played with by
what Begich and Manning call "the big boys with their new toys." HAARP is an experiment in the sky, and
experiments are done to find out something not already known. Independent scientists told Begich and Manning
that a HAARP-type "skybuster" with its unforeseen effects could be an act of global vandalism.

HAARP History
The patents described below were the package of ideas which were originally controlled by ARCO Power
Technologies Incorporated (APTI), a subsidiary of Atlantic Richfield Company, one of the biggest oil companies in
the world. APTI was the contractor that built the HAARP facility. ARCO sold this subsidiary, the patents and the
second phase construction contract to E-Systems in June 1994.
E-Systems is one of the biggest intelligence contractors in the world -- doing work for the CIA, defense intelligence
organizations and others. $1.8 billion of their annual sales are to these organizations, with $800 million for black
projects -- projects so secret that even the United States Congress isn't told how the money is being spent.
E-Systems was bought out by Raytheon, which is one of the largest defense contractors in the world. In 1994
Raytheon was listed as number forty-two on the Fortune 500 list of companies. Raytheon has thousands of patents,
some of which will be valuable in the HAARP project. The twelve patents below are the backbone of the HAARP
project, and are now buried among the thousands of others held in the name of Raytheon. Bernard J. Eastlund's
U.S. Patent # 4,686,605, "Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere;
and/or Magnetosphere," was sealed for a year under a government Secrecy Order.

The Eastlund ionospheric heater was different; the radio frequency (RF) radiation was concentrated and focused to
a point in the ionosphere. This difference throws an unprecedented amount of energy into the ionosphere. The
Eastlund device would allow a concentration of one watt per cubic centimeter, compared to others only able to
deliver about one millionth of one watt.

This huge difference could lift and change the ionosphere in the ways necessary to create futuristic effects
described in the patent. According to the patent, the work of Nikola Tesla in the early 1900's formed the basis of the
research.

What would this technology be worth to ARCO, the owner of the patents? They could make enormous profits by
beaming electrical power from a powerhouse in the gas fields to the consumer without wires.

For a time, HAARP researchers could not prove that this was one of the intended uses for HAARP. In April, 1995,
however, Begich found other patents, connected with a "key personnel" list for APTI. Some of these new APTI
patents were indeed a wireless system for sending electrical power. Eastlund's patent said the technology can
confuse or completely disrupt airplanes' and missiles' sophisticated guidance systems. Further, this ability to spray
large areas of Earth with electromagnetic waves of varying frequencies, and to control changes in those waves,
makes it possible to knock out communications on land or sea as well as in the air.

The patent said:


"Thus, this invention provides the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earth's atmosphere at
strategic locations and to maintain the power injection level particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner
far more precise and better controlled than heretofore accomplished by the prior art, particularly by detonation of
nuclear devices of various yields at various altitudes... "
"...it is possible not only to interfere with third party communications but to take advantage of one or more such
beams to carry out a communications network even though the rest of the world's communications are disrupted.
Put another way, what is used to disrupt another's communications can be employed by one knowledgeable of this
invention as a communication network at the same time."
"... large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter
unexpected and unplanned drag forces with resultant destruction."
"Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns by constructing one or
more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device.

... molecular modifications of the atmosphere can take place so that positive environmental effects can be achieved.
Besides actually changing the molecular composition of an atmospheric region, a particular molecule or molecules
can be chosen for increased presence. For example, ozone, nitrogen, etc., concentrations in the atmosphere could
be artificially increased."
Begich found eleven other APTI Patents. They told how to make "Nuclear-sized Explosions without Radiation,"
Power-beaming systems, over-the-horizon radar, detection systems for missiles carrying nuclear warheads,
electromagnetic pulses previously produced by thermonuclear weapons and other Star-Wars tricks. This cluster of
patents underlay the HAARP weapon system.
Related research by Begich and Manning uncovered bizarre schemes. For example, Air Force documents revealed
that a system had been developed for manipulating and disturbing human mental processes through pulsed
radio-frequency radiation (the stuff of HAARP) over large geographical areas. The most telling material about this
technology came from writings of Zbigniew Brzezinski (former National Security Advisory to U.S. President Carter)
and J.F. MacDonald (science advisor to U.S. President Johnson and a professor of Geophysics at UCLA), as they
wrote about use of power-beaming transmitters for geophysical and environmental warfare. The documents showed
how these effects might be caused, and the negative effects on human heath and thinking.

The mental-disruption possibilities for HAARP are the most disturbing. More than 40 pages of the book, with dozens
of footnotes, chronicle the work of Harvard professors, military planners and scientists as they plan and test this use
of the electromagnetic technology. For example, one of the papers describing this use was from the International
Red Cross in Geneva. It even gave the frequency ranges where these effects could occur -- the same ranges which
HAARP is capable of broadcasting.

The following statement was made more than twenty-five years ago in a book by Brzezinski which he wrote while a
professor at Columbia University:


"Political strategists are tempted to exploit research on the brain and human behavior. Geophysicist Gordon J.F.
MacDonald, a specialist in problems of warfare, says accurately-timed, artificially-excited electronic strokes could
lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over certain regions of the earth ... in this
way one could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations in
selected regions over an extended period"

" ... no matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using the environment to manipulate behavior for national
advantages, to some, the technology permitting such use will very probably develop within the next few decades."
In 1966, MacDonald was a member of the President's Science Advisory Committee and later a member of the
President's Council on Environmental Quality. He published papers on the use of environmental control
technologies for military purposes. The most profound comment he made as a geophysicist was, "the key to
geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of
energy would release vastly greater amounts of energy." While yesterday's geophysicists predicted today's
advances, are HAARP program managers delivering on the vision?

The geophysicists recognized that adding energy to the environmental soup could have large effects. However,
humankind has already added substantial amounts of electromagnetic energy into our environment without
understanding what might constitute critical mass. The book by Begich and Manning raises questions:

Have these additions been without effect, or is there a cumulative amount beyond which irreparable damage can be
done?
Is HAARP another step in a journey from which we cannot turn back?
Are we about to embark on another energy experiment which unleashes another set of demons from Pandora's box?
As early as 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski predicted a "more controlled and directed society" would gradually appear,
linked to technology. This society would be dominated by an elite group which impresses voters by allegedly
superior scientific know-how. Angels Don't Play This HAARP further quotes Brzezinski:

"Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by
using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance
and control. Technical and scientific momentum would then feed on the situation it exploits," Brzezinski predicted.
His forecasts proved accurate. Today, a number of new tools for the "elite" are emerging, and the temptation to use
them increases steadily. The policies to permit the tools to be used are already in place. How could the United
States be changed, bit by bit, into the predicted highly-controlled technosociety? Among the "steppingstones"
Brzezinski expected were persisting social crises and use of the mass media to gain the public's confidence.

In another document prepared by the government, the U.S. Air Force claims: "The potential applications of artificial
electromagnetic fields are wide-ranging and can be used in many military or quasi-military situations... Some of
these potential uses include dealing with terrorist groups, crowd control, controlling breaches of security at military
installations, and antipersonnel techniques in tactical warfare. In all of these cases the EM (electromagnetic)
systems would be used to produce mild to severe physiological disruption or perceptual distortion or disorientation.
In addition, the ability of individuals to function could be degraded to such a point that they would be combat
ineffective. Another advantage of electromagnetic systems is that they can provide coverage over large areas with
a single system. They are silent and countermeasures to them may be difficult to develop... One last area where
electromagnetic radiation may prove of some value is in enhancing abilities of individuals for anomalous
phenomena."

Do these comments point to uses already somewhat developed? The author of the government report refers to an
earlier Air Force document about the uses of radio frequency radiation in combat situations. (Here Begich and
Manning note that HAARP is the most versatile and the largest radio-frequency-radiation transmitter in the world.)

The United States Congressional record deals with the use of HAARP for penetrating the earth with signals
bounced off of the ionosphere. These signals are used to look inside the planet to a depth of many kilometers in
order to locate underground munitions, minerals and tunnels. The U.S. Senate set aside $15 million dollars in 1996
to develop this ability alone -- earth-penetrating-tomography. The problem is that the frequency needed for
earth-penetrating radiation is within the frequency range most cited for disruption of human mental functions. It may
also have profound effects on migration patterns of fish and wild animals which rely on an undisturbed energy field
to find their routes.
As if electromagnetic pulses in the sky and mental disruption were not enough, T. Eastlund bragged that the
super-powerful ionospheric heater could control weather.
Begich and Manning brought to light government documents indicating that the military has weather-control
technology. When HAARP is eventually built to its full power level, it could create weather effects over entire
hemispheres. If one government experiments with the world's weather patterns, what is done in one place will impact
everyone else on the planet. Angels Don't Play This HAARP explains a principle behind some of Nikola Tesla's
inventions -- resonance -- which affect planetary systems.

Bubble of Electric Particles
Angels Don't Play This HAARP includes interviews with independent scientists such as Elizabeth Rauscher. She has
a Ph.D., a long and impressive career in high-energy physics, and has been published in prestigious science
journals and books. Rauscher commented on HAARP. "You're pumping tremendous energy into an extremely
delicate molecular configuration that comprises these multi-layers we call the ionosphere."

"The ionosphere is prone to catalytic reactions," she explained, "if a small part is changed, a major change in the
ionosphere can happen."

In describing the ionosphere as a delicately balanced system, Dr. Rauscher shared her mental picture of it -- a
soap-bubble-like sphere surrounding Earth's atmosphere, with movements swirling over the surface of the bubble. If
a big enough hole is punched through it, she predicts, it could pop.

Slicing the Ionosphere
Physicist Daniel Winter, Ph.D., of Waynesville, North Carolina, says, "HAARP high-frequency emissions can couple
with longwave (extremely-low-frequency, or ELF) pulses the Earth grid uses to distribute information as vibrations to
synchronize dances of life in the biosphere." Dan terms this geomagnetic action 'Earth's information bloodstream,'
and says it is likely that coupling of HAARP HF (high-frequency) with natural ELF can cause unplanned,
unsuspected side effects.

David Yarrow of Albany, New York, is a researcher with a background in electronics. He described possible
interactions of HAARP radiation with the ionosphere and Earth's magnetic grid: "HAARP will not burn holes in the
ionosphere. That is a dangerous understatement of what HAARP's giant gigawatt beam will do. Earth is spinning
relative to thin electric shells of the multilayer membrane of ion-o-speres that absorb and shield Earth's surface
from intense solar radiation, including charged particle storms in solar winds erupting from the sun. Earth's axial
spin means that HAARP -- in a burst lasting more than a few minutes -- will slice through the ionosphere like a
microwave knife. This produces not a hole but a long tear -- an incision."

Crudely Plucking the Strings
Second concept: As Earth rotates, HAARP will slice across the geomagnetic flux, a donut-shaped spool of magnetic
strings -- like longitude meridians on maps.

HAARP may not 'cut' these strings in Gaia's magnetic mantle, but will pulse each thread with harsh, out-of-harmony
high frequencies. These noisy impulses will vibrate geomagnetic flux lines, sending vibrations all through the
geomagnetic web. "

"The image comes to mind of a spider on its web. An insect lands, and the web's vibrations alert the spider to
possible prey. HAARP will be a man-made microwave finger poking at the web, sending out confusing signals, if not
tearing holes in the threads. "

"Effects of this interference with symphonies of Gaia's geomagnetic harp are unknown, and I suspect barely thought
of. Even if thought of, the intent (of HAARP) is to learn to exploit any effects, not to play in tune to global
symphonies. "

Among other researchers quoted is Paul Schaefer of Kansas City. His degree is in electrical engineering and he
spent four years building nuclear weapons. "But most of the theories that we have been taught by scientists to
believe in seem to be falling apart," he says. He talks about imbalances already caused by the industrial and atomic
age, especially by radiation of large numbers of tiny, high-velocity particles "like very small spinning tops" into our
environment. The unnatural level of motion of highly-energetic particles in the atmosphere and in radiation belts
surrounding Earth is the villain in the weather disruptions, according to this model, which describes an Earth
discharging its buildup of heat, relieving stress and regaining a balanced condition through earthquakes and
volcanic action.

Feverish Earth
"One might compare the abnormal energetic state of the Earth and its atmosphere to a car battery which has
become overcharged with the normal flow of energy jammed up, resulting in hot spots, electrical arcing, physical
cracks and general turbulence as the pent-up energy tries to find some place to go."

In a second analogy, Schaefer says "Unless we desire the death of our planet, we must end the production of
unstable particles which are generating the earth's fever. A first priority to prevent this disaster would be to shut
down all nuclear power plants and end the testing of atomic weapons, electronic warfare and 'Star Wars'."
Meanwhile, the military builds its biggest ionospheric heater yet, to deliberately create more instabilities in a huge
plasma layer -- the ionosphere -- and to rev up the energy level of charged particles.

Electronic Rain From The Sky
They have published papers about electron precipitation from the magnetosphere (the outer belts of charged
particles which stream toward Earth's magnetic poles) caused by man-made very low frequency electromagnetic
waves. "These precipitated particles can produce secondary ionization, emit X-rays, and cause significant
perturbation in the lower ionosphere."

Two Stanford University radio scientists offer evidence of what technology can do to affect the sky by making waves
on earth; they showed that very low frequency radio waves can vibrate the magnetosphere and cause high-energy
particles to cascade into Earth's atmosphere. By turning the signal on or off, they could stop the flow of energetic
particles.

Weather Control
Avalanches of energy dislodged by such radio waves could hit us hard. Their work suggests that technicians could
control global weather by sending relatively small 'signals' into the Van Allen belts (radiation belts around Earth).
Thus Tesla's resonance effects can control enormous energies by tiny triggering signals.

The Begich/ Manning book asks whether that knowledge will be used by war-oriented or biosphere-oriented
scientists.

The military has had about twenty years to work on weather warfare methods, which it euphemistically calls weather
modification. For example, rainmaking technology was taken for a few test rides in Vietnam. The U.S. Department of
Defense sampled lightning and hurricane manipulation studies in Project Skyfire and Project Stormfury. And they
looked at some complicated technologies that would give big effects. Angels Don't Play This HAARP cites an expert
who says the military studied both lasers and chemicals which they figured could damage the ozone layer over an
enemy. Looking at ways to cause earthquakes, as well as to detect them, was part of the project named Prime
Argus, decades ago. The money for that came from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA,
now under the acronym ARPA.) In 1994 the Air Force revealed its Spacecast 2020 master plan which includes
weather control. Scientists have experimented with weather control since the 1940's, but Spacecast 2020 noted that
"using environmental modification techniques to destroy, damage or injure another state are prohibited." Having
said that, the Air Force claimed that advances in technology "compels a reexamination of this sensitive and
potentially risky topic."


40 Years of Zapping the Sky?

As far back as 1958, the chief White House advisor on weather modification, Captain Howard T. Orville, said the
U.S. defense department was studying "ways to manipulate the charges of the earth and sky and so affect the
weather" by using an electronic beam to ionize or de-ionize the atmosphere over a given area.

In 1966, Professor Gordon J. F. MacDonald was associate director of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary
Physics at the University of California, Los Angeles, was a member of the President's Science Advisory Committee,
and later a member of the President's Council on Environmental Quality.

He published papers on the use of environmental-control technologies for military purposes. MacDonald made a
revealing comment: "The key to geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental instabilities to which the
addition of a small amount of energy would release vastly greater amounts of energy. " World-recognized scientist
MacDonald had a number of ideas for using the environment as a weapon system and he contributed to what was,
at the time, the dream of a futurist. When he wrote his chapter, "How To Wreck The Environment," for the book
Unless Peace Comes, he was not kidding around. In it he describes the use of weather manipulation, climate
modification, polar ice cap melting or destabilization, ozone depletion techniques, earthquake engineering, ocean
wave control and brain wave manipulation using the planet's energy fields.

He also said that these types of weapons would be developed and, when used, would be virtually undetectable by
their victims. Is HAARP that weapon? The military's intention to do environmental engineering is well documented,
U.S. Congress' subcommittee hearings on Oceans and International Environment looked into military weather and
climate modification conducted in the early 1970's. "What emerged was an awesome picture of far-ranging research
and experimentation by the Department of Defense into ways environmental tampering could be used as a
weapon," said another author cited in Angles Don't Play This HAARP.

The revealed secrets surprised legislators. Would an inquiry into the state of the art of electromagnetic
manipulation surprise lawmakers today? They may find out that technologies developed out of the HAARP
experiments in Alaska could deliver on Gordon MacDonald's vision because leading-edge scientists are describing
global weather as not only air pressure and thermal systems, but also as an electrical system.


Small Input - Big Effect


HAARP zaps the ionosphere where it is relatively unstable. A point to remember is that the ionosphere is an active
electrical shield protecting the planet from the constant bombardment of high-energy particles from space. This
conducting plasma, along with Earth's magnetic field, traps the electrical plasma of space and holds it back from
going directly to the earth's surface, says Charles Yost of Dynamic Systems, Leicester, North Carolina. "If the
ionosphere is greatly disturbed, the atmosphere below is subsequently disturbed."

Another scientist interviewed said there is a super-powerful electrical connection between the ionosphere and the
part of the atmosphere where our weather comes onstage, the lower atmosphere.

One man-made electrical effect -- power line harmonic resonance -- causes fallout of charged particles from the
Van Allen (radiation) belts, and the falling ions cause ice crystals (which precipitate rain clouds). What about
HAARP? Energy blasted upward from an ionospheric heater is not much compared to the total in the ionosphere,
but HAARP documents admit that thousandfold-greater amounts of energy can be released in the ionosphere than
injected. As with MacDonald's "key to geophysical warfare," "nonlinear" effects (described in the literature about the
ionospheric heater) mean small input and large output. Astrophysicist Adam Trombly told Manning that an
acupuncture model is one way to look at the possible effect of multi-gigawatt pulsing of the ionosphere. If HAARP
hits certain points, those parts of the ionosphere could react in surprising ways.

Smaller ionospheric heaters such as the one at Arecibo are underneath relatively placid regions of the ionosphere,
compared to the dynamic movements nearer Earth's magnetic poles. That adds another uncertainty to HAARP --
the unpredictable and lively upper atmosphere near the North Pole.

HAARP experimenters do not impress commonsense Alaskans such as Barbara Zickuhr, who says "They're like
boys playing with a sharp stick, finding a sleeping bear and poking it in the butt to see what's going to happen."

Could They Short-Circuit Earth?
Earth as a spherical electrical system is a fairly well-accepted model. However, those experimenters who want to
make unnatural power connections between parts of this system might not be thinking of possible consequences.
Electrical motors and generators can be caused to wobble when their circuits are affected. Could human activities
cause a significant change in a planet's electrical circuit or electrical field? A paper in the respected journal Science
deals with manmade ionization from radioactive material, but perhaps it could also be studied with HAARP-type
skybusters in mind:

"For example, while changes in the earth's electric field resulting from a solar flare modulating conductivity may
have only a barely detectable effect on meteorology, the situation may be different in regard to electric field
changes caused by manmade ionization... " Meteorology, of course, is the study of the atmosphere and weather.
ionization is what happens when a higher level of power is zapped into atoms and knocks electrons off the atoms.
The resulting charged particles are the stuff of HAARP. "One look at the weather should tell us that we are on the
wrong path," says Paul Schaefer, commenting on HAARP-type technologies.
Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology is about the military's plan to manipulate that which
belongs to the world -- the ionosphere. The arrogance of the United States government in this is not without
precedent.

Atmospheric nuclear tests had similar goals. More recently, China and France put their people's money to
destructive use in underground nuclear tests. It was recently reported that the US government spent $3 trillion
dollars on its nuclear program since its beginnings in the 1940's. What new breakthroughs in life science could
have been made with all the money spent on death?

Begich, Manning, Roderick and others believe that democracies need to be founded on openness, rather than the
secrecy which surrounds so much military science. Knowledge used in developing revolutionary weapons could be
used for healing and helping mankind. Because they are used in new weapons, discoveries are classified and
suppressed. When they do appear in the work of other independent scientists, the new ideas are often frustrated or
ridiculed, while military research laboratories continue to build their new machines for the killing fields.

However, the book by Manning and Begich gives hope that the military industrial academic bureaucratic Goliath can
be affected by the combined power of determined individuals and the alternative press. Becoming informed is the
first step to empowerment.
Ads support Eyepod, click on links above.
Eyepod.Org Front Page      Featured Videos & Reports     Go to the Eyepod...  Group Home Page