|
Eyepod.Org for
more videos,
interactive
features, US
space, and
weapon
programs,
unique UFO
reports,
esoteric and
other worldly
phenomenon,
use our Google
search box
below. Click on
the eyepod.org
button and go.
Eyepod.Org...
The Alien
Chronicles
require
Windows Media
Player,
download it
free...
Click on Media
Player Icon!
Information,
corroborating
evidence,
photos, report,
and analysis if
available is
located below.
If photos are
present click for
larger image.
artifacts in the UFO field always exist. We try to the best of our ability to track
down the source of all materials we publish on Eyepod. In some cases this is
nearly impossible, nonetheless we think all cases should be viewed with an
open mind. We cannot verify the authenticity of all materials we receive, this
is one such case. It is of interest nonetheless. When we can verify the
materials and information supplied to us we will make that perfectly clear. This
case has not been fully investigated, updates if any will appear below. FRJ
Hi All.Now this IS INTERESTING !!.A few years back there was a complete TV program on this,here in the UK,made
a pretty convincig show that the Moon Landings were faked. MYSELF I'm STILL not sure !!.This Video and pic's
however DO APPEAR to be "Set Up",the BLANK BACKGROUND for instance is the typical set up for INSERTION of
another,ie a "Lunar Landscape" ???.And I'm STILL NOT SHURE.
John Bristol Uk.
The brevity of the "shot" and the absence of attribution would incline me to put this one in "file 13."
Jack
A couple of quick points relating to items on your website.
First, concerning the Apollo 11 moonwalk video. The "odd contraption
in the background " is, in fact, the shadow of the Lunar Lander Module, and the object in the right foreground is an
upper part of the Module itself (the photograph was taken from the Lander cabin which is at the top of the Module).
If anyone doesn't believe this have a look at
http://www.panoramas.dk/fullscreen3/apollo_lm.jpg.
The "blank" background is due to the camera being adjusted to the high natural contrast of the atmosphereless
lunar surface. In order to show the astronaut at a normal level of illumination the sunlit ground had to be
overexposed (so little light was scattered into the shadow that this remained black).
I think that someone may have been trying to set you up here with a phoney exclusive. If you want a real exclusive
how about this? One of the major claims of the faked Moon Landings conspiracy theorists is that no stars can be
seen in the lunar sky in the photographs taken by the Apollo astronauts (and, hence, they must have been taken
not on the Moon but on a movie set). This certainly also seems to be the case in the Apollo 11 photograph that I
have directed you to, but download it and increase both the brightness and contrast by about 100 (in IrfanView)
and you will see that there are, in fact, many stars that become
visible in the sky (an astronomer would probably be able to identify the constellations). If Apollo 11 really went to
the Moon then I don't see any reason why the other missions shouldn't have gone also. And the whole faked Moon
landings theory is thus revealed as so much garbage.
Second, although I am inclined to think that the former is most probably due to some (accidental) combination of
lighting and digital camera effects, I was nevertheless rather intrigued by the interesting similarity between frames in
your "morphing helicopter" video and those of Anthony Woods' morphing "Redship" UFO video (you can find this
by searching Rense.com - I'm afraid that I cant remember the exact address). Is it (just to prove that I do have an
open mind) possible that your video shows not a morphing helicopter but a morphing UFO disguising itself as a
helicopter? Yes, I think that is a far-fetched idea as well, but I remember that both UFOs /and /helicopters are
associated with the phenomenon of cattle mutilation, and I also remember that one rancher who actually witnessed
one of his cows being aerially abducted for mutilation swore that it was done by a black helicopter
and not a UFO. If they are not working together, or against each other, then perhaps they are the same thing. Just
a (way-out) thought.
Regards
Bob
